Trust
Hernan Diaz
402 pages
Paperback
Picador
2022
ISBN: 9781529074529
Review
‘Most of us prefer to believe we are the active subjects of our victories but only the passive objects of our defeats. We triumph, but it is not really we who fail – we are ruined by forces beyond our control.’
Andrew Bevel, a fabulously rich Wall Street trader with a gift for seeing trends before others, and his young wife Mildred bask in 1920s New York. Theirs is a seemingly carefree existence filled with extravagance and speculation. It is only when the layers of their lives are peeled away that we uncover the shocking secrets hidden by their wealth.
‘Trust’ was a book which I dearly wanted to love. A puzzle book set in the jazz age, and a novels-set-within-novels structure to boot? What’s not to love? The book does deliver on some of these promises – 1920s New York is beautifully evoked and the introverted, frantic, obsessive world of the trader makes for compelling copy.
Mildred’s deterioration is also well articulated, her mental health one of the few emotional hooks in the novel. Diaz succeeds in making us shudder as she undergoes some of the more misguided therapies in medical history, whilst her quiet, unassuming philanthropy and passion makes her the closest thing to a hero that the novel has.
Elsewhere I found the book more of a struggle. The novel-within-a-novel which makes up the first part of the book – ‘Bonds’ by Harold Vanner – is a torpid affair. Diaz’s characterisation of Vanner as a hack is faithfully borne out in the writing with the unfortunate result that we are forced to wade through textbook-dry prose for over a hundred pages. Yes, it sets the rest of the book up, but it did try my patience.
Elsewhere, and without giving too much away, it comes as no great surprise that Bevel – a trader who bets on and profits handsomely from the 1929 crash – has a questionable moral framework. This framework extends to encompass his much younger wife and the legacy she leaves behind. I found this predictable, especially as I knew that the book would be told from several points of view.
We are meant to get behind the character of Ida, the ghostwriter of Bevel’s counter-memoir. Ida is working class and has a father who is passionate about socialism. This sets up what I found to be a grimly-predictable and not particularly exciting moral dilemma for Ida as she seeks to reconcile her upbringing with the opportunity in front of her.
Perhaps this was a book that I just didn’t get. It is certainly widely-lauded elsewhere, winning the 2023 Pulitzer and awarding itself a subsidiary quasi-dustjacket so as to render its plaudits. Pleb though I might be, I do look someone to root for in a novel. This was lacking in that capacity, and was a novel which relied too heavily upon its premise and structure.
*Find my other reviews below*
Wilkie Collins – The Woman in White
Kevin Barry – The Heart in Winter
George Mackay Brown – A Time to Keep
Robert Winder – Bloody Foreigners
P. G. Wodehouse – Very Good, Jeeves
Michael Palin – Erebus: The History of a Ship
Hilary Mantel – The Mirror and the Light
Samantha Harvey – The Western Wind
Diarmaid MacCulloch – Thomas Cromwell: A Life
Peter Carey – A Long Way from Home
Val McDermid – A Place of Execution
Richard Cohen – How to Write Like Tolstoy
John Sampson – The Wind on the Heath
Jess Smith – Way of the Wanderers
Max Hastings – Vietnam: An Epic Tragedy 1945-1975
Bernard MacLaverty – Grace Notes
Ernest Hemingway – In Our Time
Andrew Roberts – Napoleon the Great
Emily Bronte – Wuthering Heights
Margaret Atwood – The Handmaid’s Tale
Annie Proulx – Brokeback Mountain
Anthony Doerr – All the Light We Cannot See
Harper Lee – To Kill a Mockingbird
Colson Whitehead – The Underground Railroad
Amor Towles – A Gentleman in Moscow
Thanks for reading folks. Recent short stories include ‘Deposition‘ and ‘The Worst Part‘.
Matthew Richardson is a writer of short stories. His work has featured in Gold Dust magazine, Literally Stories, Close to the Bone, McStorytellers, Penny Shorts, Soft Cartel, Whatever Keeps the Lights On, Flashback Fiction, Cafelit, Best MicroFiction 2021, Writer’s Egg, Idle Ink, The Wild Word, Down in the Dirt, and Shooter magazine. He ha
Interesting, in many ways, but probably not for me.Like I’ve said, and several times… I’ve already to many books to read!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I had high hopes for this Chris, but it just didn’t land for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
a thorough, brave — in view of the plaudits its received — and honest review —
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks John. Just one that didn’t do enough for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was a very interesting, worthwhile review, Matthew. I think you gave the writer his due–and certainly saved me from spending time on a work that seems to have suffered from its own self-importance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was one of those books that I really wanted to love, but it never took flight for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person